|
|
 |
|

Dividing the Pie on Her Own Terms
by Donna Nowak
Filmmaker and writer Mark Toscani wrote a wonderful essay about Joan Crawford called “Reflections
on Joan” while fan Jonathan Denson, on a small poignant site created in teen years, explains why she
is his hero. As I delve deeper and deeper into the life of the actress and
her prodigious body of work, I not only marvel at her achievements and influence, but also connect deeply with the sort of grassroots
feminist she embodied in life and on film (perhaps out of necessity since she had
to fight and work to survive after a turbulent childhood and aborted formal education) while keeping every
long eyelash, manicured nail, ankle-strapped heel, broad "a" and blessedly unpolitically-correct-fur in place. Some
call her a glamorous feminist. I call her my feminist hero. There aren't piss-and-vinegar, sexy dames like that around anymore and we will
perhaps never see her like again. She was a complex, enigmatic, contradictory product of her era and difficult
life, but just as she devoted herself whole-heartedly to her fans (giving back where she felt she received), she doubtless
inspired myriad women in the audience to want more out of life and go the mile to get it. She relied on men as
her conduit in a man's world, and was often required to suffer for her ambition but she was living in an age when she was
actually allowed and expected to carry and dominate a film, and she was more than up to the task. Joan Crawford was a powerhouse.
Amazingly, Crawford was sassy from the get-go, even though she was also tender and waiflike and sweet in a way that
many have forgotten, if they ever knew. She was extremely vivacious and cute in her early, flapper films, a
mere girl. But even in the silents, her presence was virile and charismatic. You couldn't look away from
her, despite occasional bad hairstyles and grating rawness. Her energy and charm was undeniable. Unlike a
number of other actresses who came to Hollywood, Crawford did not
have a strong, loving family behind her, however, so in her eagerness to keep the job that kept her off the streets, she worked
diligently, even while ill. Soon, when she made good, she was supporting her hardscrabble mother who many seem to fault
for neglecting her daughter and favoring son Hal, but frankly mother Anna was as hapless and vulnerable as her children,
horribly poor and having to scramble and work to keep body and soul together. Anna made an effort to send Joan
to school, although the girl was apparently badly abused, overworked and maltreated at these establishments,
particularly by a sadistic school mistress at Rockingham Academy, and victimized by snobbery on top of it. A victim
herself, Anna was undereducated, promiscuous and dependent on shiftless men. The arguments Crawford heard at night
between mother and men which frightened her draw comparison to sounds of violence chilling Christina in her bed way past
the hour a generation later. Crawford also was supporting Hal, who she described as "chronically mean" and
did not enjoy a close relationship with. He once allegedly locked her in a dark closet. Predictably the good-for-nothing
family came in for the kill when Crawford reached success, but then why wouldn't they? I'd grab the life raft, too,
wouldn't you?
|
|
| With mother Anna and brother Hal |
In a 1947 interview on The Louella Parsons Show before the release of "Daisy Kenyon" and
prior to what she bills as her "next Warner Brothers picture," "Until Proven Guilty" (uh- guess she -- and we -- missed
that one!), Crawford cuts to the chase about a "subject she feels deeply about." Parsons laughs
and counters Joan feels deeply about everything. Crawford sounds very cute and bubbly, much like her flapper-girl personality,
admitting that's true, but adding, "Louella, honestly I do want to answer the one question that so many girls write me about. [T]hey
write me about the whole big subject about whether or not to become career women. Those poor little kids just starting
out -- oh, golly -- I can't exaggerate how mixed up they are about it!" When asked by Parsons what mixes them up, she wryly
responds, "What mixes up a woman on anything except men. I think it's a crying shame that so many girls let themselves
be scared out of self-improvement and success by the same, old, sly masculine lies." Parsons wants to know which particular
ones? "Oh, that threat of their's that if you become a successful career woman, you lose your femininity and therefore,
they won't like you. Oh, what a lie that is." Using Louella as an example, she adds, "Nobody can be more feminine
than you are and that same thing goes for any big career woman you can think of in any line like Mrs. Roosevelt or Clare Boothe
Luce or Helen Hayes or Ingrid Bergman." Louella laughs and tells her to calm down. "Okay, kid me," Crawford responds
sassily. "I warned you how I felt on this subject, but I do want to assure the girls that there's so much less
danger in going ahead and proving themselves than there is in lingering behind while your dream boy goes ahead somewhere else
to - uh - somebody else." After Parsons objects that not everyone can become a "glamour girl" like Joan, Crawford
savvily responds, "Oh, yes, they can," adding that if she came from nothing and became the "assembly job" that "tags glamour,"
any one can do it, it being a matter of discipline and applied art. She says "to the girls just starting out" that "if
you have the capacity to be a career woman, you can be a careerist and a woman, too. . . . That way your life will be always
exciting."
Clearly and
happily, Crawford did care about encouraging her female fans, letting them know, too, that she was listening and
responding to their concerns. Evidently, given her slavish devotion to her audience, it was no pose. As one listens
to her live interviews, right from the horse's mouth, it becomes apparent how much she mirrored the life-hungry, life-affirming,
gutsy and ambitious women she played onscreen. She was effective in these roles, because she lived them, lived every
emotion and, according to co-star James Stewart, did it spontaneously in one take ("My first impression of [her] was
of glamour," he says in Charles Castle's The Raging Star. "Glamour had nothing to do with aloofness or
temperament, it had to do with friendliness, tremendous vitality and hard work, ambition and constant desire to improve her
work, and to get knowledgeable about things that were important to her work. . . We have both been referred
to as perfectionists, but I don't know what that word means. If it means trying to keep things going by learning
your craft so that you can get it done to the best of your ability and not have the acting show, then I suppose that's
what it is. If it means standing up against this tremendous technical thing which you have to cope with in the
movies all the time, doing things with credibility and being believable when you're surrounded by machines and cameras
and technical men with lights and everything else to surmount. . . This is part of a craft that takes learning, and if you
get so that it doesn't bug you, then you can understand why Joan Crawford was so good at her job.")
Crawford could
do six impossible things before breakfast -- at least, you believe she'd try -- and was evidently telling her audience,
women, they could do it, too. She whole-heartedly befriended her fans in a way that no star ever had (to my
knowledge) or certainly would (or even could, given stalkers) today. Whether her motive was a desire for love,
sense of professionalism or wanting to give back for their support, her commitment and certainly generosity was there.
How many fans must have blossomed with her example, inspiration and the attention she gave to their importance? How
many letters must have brightened an anonymous life? What a unique devotion and collaboration with the public.
It was a mighty big thank you. (See photos [last two on page] of JC with fans here.)
In 1975 when Crawford was in her "later years," Barbara
Ribakove of Photoplay reported: "[Crawford] gets blazingly angry at professionals who do not take their work seriously as
she feels they should. 'When you stop being grateful, forget it. You might just as well leave the screen, because
that camera picks up everything inside you. You cannot hide your attitude towards work.' Another pause.
Then, all the way up from the gut: 'And when you consider those of us that cannot get a job because nobody writes for
women anymore. . .and we are dying to work! Dying!'"

|
| Adorable young Joan (with Ramon Navarro) |
Young Joan and the Shopgirl Who Made Good
Beginning in the 1920's, Joan had
an enormous following of women. According to Popcorn Venus by Marjorie Rosen, in a group of studies made by
the Payne Fund between 1929 and 1933, she was cited repeatedly as a behavioral model by teen-age girls. "When I go to
see a modern picture like Our Dancing Daughters," one high-school sixteen-year-old wrote, "I am thrilled.
These modern pictures give me a feeling to imitate their ways. I believe that nothing will happen to the carefree girl
like Joan Crawford." Many people are unaware of her impact on youth, clearly commensurate with a Britney Spears
or Lindsay Lohan or even more, Annette Funicello (like Annette, with a coterie of energetic, romantically canoodling “kids”
as backup “pals” in Jazz Age days). She was a rabble rouser,
but a rabble rouser who was sensible in “Our Dancing Daughters” and “Our Blushing Brides.” She was the role model for “young moderns.” Interestingly,
the girls in her trio of “Our” films, beginning with “Dancing Daughters,” all taste the wild life: drinking
champagne, tooling in fast cars with boys, and black bottoming the night away in clingy fringed dresses. "See you at
dawn!" Crawford as "Dangerous Diana" calls to her liberal parents in "Our Dancing Daughters." By the 1930’s,
she morphed into a working girl who toiled in factories, but wanted more. How devastating she
is in "Mannequin" with the line, "Women are weak and men are strong. My mother wasted a lifetime of strength trying
to prove that." In "Possessed," where she became Clark Gable's mistress and rebukes a disapproving crowd
with dignity, she tells her mother, “If I were a man…you’d think it was right for me to go out and get anything
I could out of life and use anything I had to get it. Why should men be so different? All they’ve got are their brains and they’re not afraid to use them. Well, neither am I!" (In that film, they also show her on a merry-go-round with
yes, the brass ring - metaphor, metaphor!)
|
|
| Getting off the merry-go-round of poverty |
In Maria Buszek’s Pin Up Grrrls: Feminism,
Sexuality, Popular Culture, she posits that Crawford revamped her image as a homemaker and “bachelor mom”
when the strong working girl she represented in the 30’s went out of fashion.
It’s self-evident that Crawford, like Madonna, was a master marketer, continually reinventing herself to move
with the times, but the inference that she was a mere image-maker is inaccurate. It’s
not surprising that women like Madonna and Crawford who knew struggle learned to be hucksters and play top brass at their
own game, but the housewife image had weight for Crawford. Even in the 20’s,
she was knitting and baking and doing some of her own housework; in the 40’s she became a complete homemaker (yes, in
the days of Rosie the Riveter) and clearly taught her children to be self-sufficient domestically, as Christina’s
roommate attested in Fred Lawrence Guiles' Joan Crawford: The Last Word.
To the end, she was known to scrub her own floors, believing in “hands and knees” elbow grease which is
why her maid Mamacita (a German woman) got the job. She’d grown up doing
drudge work. In 1975 Photoplay, Barbara
Ribakove said, “Joan is a scrubber of kitchen counters, a picker-up of microscopic bits of lint. Everything is
immaculate. To Joan, a clean home is the outward and visible form of an inner and spiritual discipline. Her daily chores around
the house are things Joan has done since her childhood, things that give her satisfaction.” In later years, this
was to manifest itself in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Despite Crawford's efforts and amazingly resilient spirit, repercussions
from a harsh and love-deficient childhood were inevitable. There were enormous hurdles to surmount and she did
it with discipline and order, maintaining schedules (which some ridicule, but frankly they strike me as reasonably sane) to
keep all on track, and industrious effort.
As Jeanine Basinger reveals in The Star Machine, MGM, for one, demanded nothing
less from its stable of stars. Crawford's second husband Franchot Tone describes her grueling schedule (although
one suspects he wouldn't complain too loudly if such "demands" were on him, it being well-documented that he resented his
wife's career eclipsing his own). Still, a star could hardly be asleep at the wheel even on few hours of sleep:
"She must get her homework done, her lines learned every day. She has continuous meetings with the producer or the director
or somebody else equally important each evening. She has to get up at four or four-thirty in the morning in order to
get to the hairdresser and onto the set. She needs a massage at night before she can sleep for a few hours.
She has to eat sparingly and exercise constantly. This goes on and on . . . and when Saturday night comes. . . other
duties, other priorities arise. Conferences about the next script. . . she's a star." Other stars had it no easier,
although it evidently reaped incalculable rewards, too, and Crawford thrived on it -- on industry, usefulness and challenge.
She was grateful to the hand that fed her.
| Youthful vulnerability and sad eyes |

|
| Crawford begins her movie career in tender teen years |
|
|
| Early risque cheesecake for teenage Joan |
Although she did her share of cheesecake
(and sports-oriented) publicity photos with other young starlets at MGM and was featured frequently in her underwear in films,
Crawford was serious about being more than decorative. She hung around soundstages,
absorbing sponge-like, and became extremely knowledgeable about all aspects of filmmaking.
From the get-go, she endeavored to ingratiate herself with the technicians, too - remembering uncannily and diplomatically small
details about their families and lives, and treating them generously financially. She
anonymously set up a wing at Hollywood Presbyterian Hospital so that newspapermen, extras, aging stars, gaffers and grips could get
operations and treatment they otherwise couldn't afford and paid the bills for years.
“She has an amazing effect upon people – an almost hypnotic power over them,” Helen Louise Walker
of 1934’s Silver Screen observed, “Yet, Joan cares more than anyone
I have ever known about what people think of her. She reads every word that is
written about her and usually cries bitterly over it. . . . She wants approval and admiration and friendship so desperately.
. . .I should hate to try to live with Joan, try to cope with her moods and her intensity. Yet, that very vitality,
that electric something, that abandonment of herself to emotion, is what makes her so interesting, so personally powerful.”
Elsa McKenzie, a dancer at MGM during those early years, recalls how hard Crawford worked, adding, "[A]nd once
in a while, when she relaxed, you could see something in her eyes that was like -- well, like fright and loneliness mixed
together."
Much
is made of Crawford's “easy” or voracious sexuality, her sexual aggression, some of it perhaps natural, some
possibly resulting from childhood sexual abuse (at age eleven) by stepfather Henry Cassin (“the center of my child’s
world”), the latter abuse confessed to friend Lawrence Quirk in later years and which she felt completely responsible
for. Like her mother, she was wildly promiscuous.
But she was also prey to exploitation, particularly in those early
years, as so many girls in Hollywood were. She was one of the girls
MGM provided for visiting execs, the men often not kind. In her memoirs,
Being and Becoming, Myrna Loy details meeting Crawford when they were both extras/chorus girls in the film,
“Pretty Ladies.” "One day, Joan came into the dressing room looking very unhappy," Loy recalled. "She
fell into my lap -- we were snowflakes covered with marabou that kept getting into our mouths -- and she began to cry. Joan
always worried terribly. I did, too, but never showed it. Apparently, Harry Rapf, the producer who discovered
her, had chased her around the desk the night before. She was having a terrible time. She had such a
beautiful body that they were all after her. I didn't have quite that much trouble -- my sort of snooty attitude put
them off a bit. . . . Joan and I became friends and stayed friends, which is the most that came out of my first MGM experience."
|
|
| Sweet-faced - with James Murray on "Rosemarie" in 1928 |
Shoulder Pads and Power Suits
Crawford took necessary risks in her career and fought for challenging roles, not
wanting to stagnate. When her career reached a stalemate in the late 1930's, she lobbied for an unsympathetic but meaty
role in "The Women," then opted out of her contract altogether at MGM when she was being pushed out by a younger crop of stars.
"It was a strange period, however you judge it," she later told author Roy Newquist in Conversations with Crawford.
"They might just as well have sent all the women 'of a certain age' to Alaska and pensioned us off." She staged
an amazing coupe at Warners with her Oscar for "Mildred Pierce," but this was after she actually went off salary until a worthy
part came her way. She had to close up part of her house, worked in her victory garden and ostensibly became a housewife. "Mildred
Pierce," my favorite Crawford film, is shown in Women's Studies classes since it's about a female entrepreneur who is
"punished" (allegedly) with hardship for leaving the family, a take I don't buy (see my review of the James M. Cain novel
here). It is the penultimate Joan Crawford film.
In “Mildred Pierce,” Crawford is
at her most iconic -- linebacker shoulder pads, glamorous furs, expressive eyes, ankle-strap shoes, suffering
and allure, outrageous rolled 40's hairstyles, stylized smoking, determination. An ordinary housewife
takes the bull by the horns, jilting the philandering husband. She learns to succeed in a man's world with a combination
of feminine wiles and smarts, on men's terms in some ways -- learning to fight dirty (yet remaining human). Mildred
had many parallels to Crawford: she was the breadwinner ultimately betrayed, publicly and privately; desire
for love remained tragically unfulfilled in spite of phenomenal success; and both had a daughter who used their money
and influence liberally and then betrayed them. Crawford ate crow and although an established star, submitted to an
audition to win the part and went to bat for Ann Blyth for the role of Veda, the two stars becoming friends for life.

|
| Classic 40's look |
Her face, although lovely, shows signs of strain in “Mildred,” indicative of the "Hollywood saw mill," as one reviewer put it, that continually taxed Crawford, a ravished look that befit the
character. (In the late 30's and early 40's with career and marriage disintegrating, she suffered from bouts of depression
and pneumonia, according to MGM files). One of my favorite moments is when Mildred returns from Mexico in her dynamic, impeccably
cut suit and strappy heels. Her hair is swept fetchingly up. Smoking and crossing sleek legs, she removes
a fleck of tobacco from her tongue and tells friend Ida (Eve Arden) that she learned to drink from men. The same was
true of Crawford in real life, who avoided alcohol in early years because of the alcoholic scenes she'd witnessed as a child (funny
how history repeats itself), yet eventually was introduced to cocktails with third husband Phil Terry and began relying increasingly
on alcohol to "jack myself up to meet people," as she puts it in Conversations. ("I'm not a public person,
at all. . . Vodka relaxed me, chased away the butterflies, put a certain safe distance between me and everybody else. . .
.a type of fright worse than stage fright.") For me, Mildred Pierce, the role for which she won an Oscar after Hollywood assumed she was through, sums
up Joan Crawford more than any other.
| With Zachary Scott in "Mildred Pierce" |

|
Ann Blyth
(Veda of "Mildred Pierce") on Crawford: "I never saw her edgy or nervous. She was very kind. Very
beautiful. Always exquisitely dressed. Her professionalism was stunning."
| NOTE THE CIGARS! |
|
|
| In her "Grand Hotel" years - negotiating with the big boys |
In the 1940's, Crawford shed most of her former girlishness, although
it was still discernible even in later years. Mindful of critics and wanting to please her public, she was evidently
criticized in neophyte days for nervous tics like hand wringing and lip biting, so she rehearsed with her hands tied.
She rarely played an actual shopgirl, but onscreen and off, she was often a sexual outlaw, combatting social disfavor with
dignity. Many believe feminism is about equal wages. To my mind, feminism is about sex, about the idea that a
woman's body is sinful and primarily for the control and gratification of men. It's about the use of words like "whore,"
"tramp," "ho," "bitch," and the like used to describe women who are sexually active in the way men traditionally have been.
Crawford's characters frequently "don't stand on ceremony," as Joan's cub reporter Bonnie Jordan puts in "Dance, Fools, Dance."
In real life, Joan didn't either.
In spite of being fairly small and petite (yet occasionally creating a statuesque illusion), Crawford could
hold her own against any man onscreen (and in some ways, off). As director Steven Spielberg put it after directing her
in "Night Gallery" (his neophyte debut), "In a two shot with anyone, even Gable, your eyes fix on her." In A Portrait
of Joan, her "autobiography" of sorts (written "with" Jane Kesner Ardmore), she talks about an unnamed deep love
of hers from New York, who "taught me to hunt and fish, we used to go on these expeditions with a whole group of men.
The first time, I'm sure, their reaction was, oh, no, not a dame tagging along! I carried my own gun and my own camera,
waded through streams in the vanguard; and at noon when we'd camp, I'd help fix lunch and surprise them with all sorts of
snacks packed away in my knapsack just in case they didn't catch any fish. This friend introduced me to politics, to
banking, big business and public affairs." Just as she learned to drink from men, she learned to play them
at their own game in business and sex. She was nonetheless reduced to tears easily and often went to directors in tears
about difficulties she was having with a part. She would have inconsolable crying spells, according to first husband
Douglas Fairbanks, Jr., but emerge refreshed.
Ladies man/attorney Greg Bautzer, with whom Crawford had a celebrated tempestuous relationship for
a number of years, in a taped interview said, "I had been in several fights with men during my lifetime. I've won some
and I've lost some but no man ever put a scar on my face. I've got about four scars on my face that she put on.
She should've been on a New York Yankees pitching staff. She could take a cocktail glass across a room and hit you right
in the face two out of three times." (Go, Joan!) “When she was
in love,” adds friend Radie Harris, “she was over-in-love and very predatory, very possessive about her men.” Of course, Bautzer, although he admits he was "stuck on her," doesn’t mention
the black eye he gave her or that he climbed a rose trellis after she locked him out of the house to be with her (leading
to what she termed "the most exciting sexual experience" of her life), their fights and reconciliations dramatic, disturbing
(especially since men and women are not of equal size or body weight) and legion.
These occasionally volatile relationships with men were a sad sign of cracks in the foundation of order and, as always with
Crawford, not the whole story. Fairbanks said the only arguments they had were very civil and she
admitted to being a different person with each husband. She enjoyed a number of enduring platonic male friendships including Cesar Romero, Van Johnson and William Haines. In Jane Ellen Wayne’s Crawford’s
Men, an anonymously identified former real estate broker who had a one night stand with Crawford is interviewed. “She was lovely, and the night we met, I admired her gown, jewelry, and
furs because she knew how to wear them.” Crawford asked him to drive her
home and in the car asked all about him. “By the time we got to her house
we were laughing, and she asked me to have a brandy with her,” he continued. “She
teased and flirted but was very sophisticated. . . . . I don’t know
many men who would turn down an opportunity with a woman, but even fewer who were almost hypnotized.” He described her as being in complete command. “I had
never been with any woman like Crawford. I forgot about the dinner party, who
I was, who she was, and where I was. . . From what I understand she always found out about the men she chose.” In
"The Ultimate Star" documentary, a biography of her life,
friend Herbert Kenwith mentions going to lunch with her and finding all three of her ex-husbands (Steele, of
course, died, leaving her a widow) at her table! "She could go to a sales meeting and all the boys would clamor
around her and she would shake their hands," he added, referring to her days promoting Pepsi Cola for fourth husband Al Steele,
Pepsi honcho.
| With Spencer Tracy |
|
|
| During Lux Soap radio show |
| Viewing the rushes with David Miller... |
|
|
| ..on set of "Sudden Fear" |
|
 |
|
|
| First woman to be elected to the board of Pepsi Cola |
Even while amusing herself with one night stands, however, Crawford remained at heart a romantic.
Director Vincent Sherman felt she was looking for the knight in shining armor.
She often slept with her directors, allegedly feeling more secure if they loved her and presumably were invested in
her, therefore. She was also very loyal, ensuring that crew members from early days and friends found employment. “You know, Louella, I believe a career woman has earned the right to be an idealist
in love,” she tells Louella Parsons in 1947. For excerpts of her early love
letters in book review, click here. A poem written between marriages in the early 40’s begins, “Where are you? My heart cries out in agony, In my extended hands, I give my heart with, All its cries – its songs
–its love.” With typical distortion, she is now often portrayed as
a calculator, marrying for advancement. It strikes me as odd that women, in general,
would be vilified as “gold diggers” when given such scant economic clout, but clearly the situation is inaccurate
with Crawford. From all accounts, she seemed genuinely interested in finding
a partner who would be an equal, weighing marriage carefully after the first one failed.
Furthermore, she was already an established star with all of her marriages and frequently her husbands had more or
at least as much to gain in the alliance as she did; in the case of her three actor-husbands, she easily eclipsed them in
terms of power. Brentwood was Crawford’s
house and her husbands who lived there were living in her home, not the other way around. She
was very involved with corporate sponsorship after marrying Pepsi exec Steele, campaigning internationally for the product
and becoming a forerunner in product placement. The “Joan Crawford”
name helped Pepsi tremendously and gave Crawford a renewed sense of worth and activity when she no longer found it in Hollywood.
She was the breadwinner for husbands, studio, and children. In later years she took care of second husband Tone when
he was ailing.
| Shopgirls and sexual harrassment |
|
|
| Joan and a sea of men (what else?) |
The Damned Don't Cry and the 1950's Films - Vinegar and Spice and Not Everything Nice
"The Damned Don't Cry" is perhaps
my favorite Joan Crawford film of the 1950's. It's a superb film noir and crime drama, vastly underrated. Because
it has so many Crawford screen personas rolled into one and because she is such a brassy dame in it, some view it
as camp. But it's actually hard-hitting, fast-paced and brilliantly cast, acted and shot. The black and white
cinematography alone is stunning. It's got everything and it's got Joan. For once, Crawford has supporting actors,
even if they're known essentially as B-actors, who are as strong as she is, each a perfect fit for his character. Crawford
as Ethel Whitehead/Lorna Hansen Forbes -- sleeping her way to the top of a crime syndicate for sheer survival --
is an aggressive, ballsy, sassy woman. She doesn't let herself get pushed to the sidelines and strides through
a room as if she owns it, sleek as a racehorse. She plays hard ball with the boys -- gangsters, no less -- and tangles
with men several times her size, unafraid to speak her mind, unafraid to trick the tricksters, irritated to be left out
of their secret "men's club," and savvy, whatever her limitations are. She's tough, but vulnerable and sensitive.
"You might invite me into the library," she tells gangster George Castleman (David Brian), to which he responds, "There's
one thing I never do in the presence of women -- discuss business." "That should leave you room for plenty of other
interests," Ethel retorts icily. Ethel Whitehead wants her piece of
the pie and she's gonna get it. She's not content with mere survival; her ambition is to constantly improve herself.
She is pure Joan Crawford.
The interesting thing about Crawford, as embodied in roles like Ethel Whitehead/Lorna Hansen Forbes (Ethel's manufactured
persona), is that she had a masculine energy and assertiveness without being at all masculine. People joke about her
eyebrows, which were not yet overstated in The Damned Don't Cry, but she was actually an extremely feminine woman,
as most who knew her mentioned. Men held open doors for her and lit her cigarettes on film and in life. Rare were
the times she was not sleekly dressed with fetching high heels ("f-me shoes," as they were called) and furs, never eschewing
ruffles and elaborate hats, opera gloves and ankle bracelets. There is that fascinating
duality about her face. In her early years, she was like a soft doe with baleful yet sultry eyes, and
although the shape of her face was perfect and could be photographed well from any angle, her jaw line became more hollowed
or sunken as she aged (like her birth father Thomas LeSueur), giving an arguably harsher look.
The harsh look wasn’t the whole story, either; it softened from moment to moment and film to film, depending
on the role, but it reflected, for me, the grit and determination Crawford felt as she was bucking a system that was fighting
her. What would have happened if
women like Joan Crawford and Bette Davis hadn't challenged that system? Both fought to hang onto the careers they had
hard-earned when studios would have buried them at age 35. They were ambitious in an age when ambition in women
was reviled (as if it still isn't.) In order to swim upstream, Joan Crawford played with the boys, as she had in
childhood. In a taped interview, director Vincent Sherman said Joan felt men were the enemy, although clearly she
loved and desired them, too. Funny, that made me like her even more. Given the status of women worldwide, how
could any woman believe otherwise?
|
|
| Sexual Aggressor in "The Damned Don't Cry" |
Female on the Beach: Swimming Against the Tide
In the 1950’s, Crawford had a
steelier edge because she played characters who were velvet bitches or who were supposed to be perceived as such (I found
them smart and on the money, devious by necessity in hostile surroundings.) Roles offered
at this time leaned heavily towards older woman being “punished” (in “Queen Bee,” she is actually
murdered by alcoholic hubby in a fiery car crash for the crime of adultery and general uppity-ness, something which still
leaves me chilled and inflamed – no pun intended). In “Autumn Leaves,”
it’s pronounced to a twisted extreme, although she gives a superb, nuanced performance as typist Millicent Weatherby
in a May/December romance. Degrading ads for the film, advancing masochism and abuse towards women, include one reading: “I never know what’s coming next. . . a kiss or a slap.
Yet I can’t let them take him. . . the one man who needed me. . .
the way I need him . . .” (That kind of need you can bypass, sister. Ask the battered wives in the morgue.) Millie
is subjected to horrific abuse, including black eyes and having a typewriter thrown at her hand. But Crawford prevails, as she always does – uneasily in that film, its "happy" ending leaving me
queasy and distrustful, not happy. In “Female on the Beach,” a guilty
(or not-so-guilty) pleasure, she gets romantically entangled with a younger beach bum (Jeff Chandler) but -- another
glitch --she's not sure if he plans murder for the honeymoon. Still, Crawford
is victorious in that one after being chased up and down the beach in strappy heels and cocktail dresses; she's
an unparalleled hoot. The mature Crawford's ballsiness has a new connotation, an unmasked cynicism that is refreshingly
on the money. Even her disgust with youth -- the look she flashes her genuinely annoying "niece" in "Queen Bee" -- is
priceless. She could say a lot with a look or an intonation. And I'm sure her post-forty female fans understood.
“Harriet Craig,” directed by Vincent Sherman, is satirically alleged to be a role tailor-made for Crawford,
meant to vilify a beautiful, yet “controlling” woman who worships her orderly home at the expense of her marriage. To my mind, Harriet is wholly sympathetic, clearly far more capable of running things
than hubby Walter (Wendell Corey), her power covert and manipulative by necessity. How
laughable it is that she should be condemned for objecting to Walter’s all-night poker games, his natural slovenly tendencies
or a job that would send him and one of his buddies to Japan for three months without her. Crawford is sexy, regal and magnificent in the role,
giving it a full range of shading and authority. Interestingly, Dorothy
Azner who directed Crawford in “The Bride Wore Red” adapted George Kelly’s misogynistic original play for
the film version “Craig’s Wife” with Rosalind Russell. (See
my review of the play here. Note you must scroll down to find it.)
As Julia Lesage noted in The Hegemonic Female Fantasy, Azner infuriated
author Kelly by suggesting Walter was dominated by his mother (as he appears to be) and fell in love with a woman stronger
than he. Azner recalled, “Kelly rose to his six-foot height and said, ‘That is not my play. Walter Craig was
a sweet guy and Mrs. Craig was an SOB.’ He left. That was the only contact I had with Kelly." Therefore, the condemnation
of Crawford in this "signature" role has many layers, her own "icy" capability or authority faulted in a way that a man of
authority never would be. The irony also is that women are thrown brickbats for succeeding in the very narrow domain
they are forced to occupy.
Some biographers posit that during
the mid-50’s, Billie Cassin began to assert herself beneath the façade of Joan Crawford.
In Conversations, when speaking of the way she and Clark Gable gave each other courage, Crawford
explained, "We had become people and images foreign to ourselves, and we were trying to really live the new parts.” And in a 1955 interview: “When
I’m tired, Billie’s child voice, Southern accent and all, rises again in my throat.” Certainly in the 50’s films, once again facing a cross-roads in her career, she often shows
signs of strain and exhaustion. Anna Raeburn noted in Legends, “[F]or the first time, there were reports of her being unpleasant to her colleagues on the set. It is easy to see how, as she knew she had peaked in terms of how she looked and what
she could accomplish, so she began to increase her demands that she should be noticed, have attention paid to her, be acceded
to . . .” Some claim she was "threatened" by younger actresses (another old sawhorse used to diminish women);
however, she was more of a pro than that, championing up-and-coming co-stars like Geraldine Brooks, Ann Blyth, and
Diane Baker but frustrated (and showing it) by those who weren't measuring up like Lucy Marlow.
|
|
| Battered wife in "Autumn Leaves" (leave - no pun intended - him!) |
In a 1952 interview with the uber-annoying Mary Margaret Mc Bride
(she frequently prattles on about herself, is unwittingly insulting and addresses Crawford as “Joan Crawford"), Crawford’s
grit leaks out beneath grandstanding befitting the Miss America pageant (“I just love people!”) Our gal,
ever the marketer, even makes a plug for Lux soap, which she probably genuinely used, and reveals how she is misinterpreted
by press. This is, of course, after McBride embarrasses her by saying she doesn’t
like Crawford’s interviews on paper and wonders why they come out so poorly. “I
know several women interviewers particularly have an idea of Joan Crawford,” Crawford explains, her voice lapsing
into heavy Southern twang. “They say it’s a clothes horse idea, a
show off idea and they never give me any idea for thinking or constructive thinking.
As a matter of fact, they never even talk to me about anything but clothes.”
(McBride would talk to her primarily about children.) Her Southern drawl surfacing
repeatedly, Crawford later breaks from the long discourse on motherhood (are famous men ever questioned so obsessively
on fatherhood?) to plug “Sudden Fear,” her upcoming film. She doesn’t
read a lot when working on a picture, she explains, because “I’m conc
| | |